Internet Info 1997 December/Internet_Info_CD-ROM_Walnut_Creek_December_1997.iso/ietf/urn/urn-archives/urn-ietf.archive.9703/000049_owner-urn-ietf _Mon Mar 24 10:41:03 1997.msg

Internet Message Format | 1997-04-01 | 2KB

Received: (from daemon@localhost)
    by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA10104
    for urn-ietf-out; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 10:41:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1])
    by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA10099
    for <[e-mail]>; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 10:41:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from acl.lanl.gov by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b)
        id AA09338  (mail destined for [e-mail]); Mon, 24 Mar 97 10:41:00 -0500
Received: from montana (montana.acl.lanl.gov [128.165.147.143]) by acl.lanl.gov (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA08341; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 08:39:32 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
X-Sender: [e-mail]
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 08:38:31 -0700
To: "Karen R. Sollins" <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
From: "Ron Daniel, Jr." <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [URN] question #4 - benefits to provider as criterion
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ron Daniel, Jr." <[e-mail]>
Errors-To: [e-mail]

At 05:52 PM 3/23/97 -0500, Karen R. Sollins wrote:

>Should it be a requirement (or suggestion) that there be some benefit
>accruing to a provider who supports a server providing some part of an
>RDS system?

Once again, I think this is outside the scope of a RDS requirements document.



Ron Daniel Jr.              voice:[phone]
Advanced Computing Lab        fax:[phone]
MS B287                     email:[e-mail]
Los Alamos National Lab      http://www.acl.lanl.gov/~rdaniel
Los Alamos, NM, USA, 87545